We live in a
changing society (now, does that sound dumb?) .
The definition of the words, family and relationship, may be getting
metamorphosed. ‘Open’ relationships and
‘Friends with Benefits’ are talked about.
While I leave it to the choice of the advocates of such relationships, I
DO NOT endorse them. Did extramarital or
clandestine relationships never exist?
No, they did exist. Despite them,
Lord Rama became the icon of loyalty to wife or Ekapatnivratya (Women were
always expected to follow their husbands, though). I vote for loyalty between the spouses for it
differentiates humans from their ancestors, the apes.
Anyway, the
discussion is not about the way society was, is or going to be. Each one of us has known of couples who were
loyal to each other despite challenges like familial pressure to separate,
inability to beget children (which is a valid ground to file for divorce),
chronic ill-health of one of them or politics, plain and simple, to inherit
property, so on and so forth. If there
were a re-incarnation of Rama in the 19th – 20th
centuries, he would have been called Ramakrishna Rao.
I have never
known how this gentleman looked like, but he was my grandfather’s teacher. This is, as usual, a fictionalized account of
the loyalty of a man who lived in times where every educated man considered it
as a matter of prestige to take a concubine.
* * * * * * * * * *
Ramakrishna Rao entered the class meant for the
students of the Intermediate Class. The
students stood up and wished him. He
greeted them back, took out his watch, and placed it on the table, and began
his class. He held the attention of the
students not by the force of his voice, but by his teaching prowess. It would not be an overstatement to say that
those who were fortunate enough to be his students, had the privilege of being
spell-bound.
He was a hard task master, and ensured his students were
prompt in doing the work assigned to them.
If he found a spelling mistake in the composition book of a student,
even if he were the topper, the teacher would make him write an imposition of
ten times to ensure that the student never ever misspelt the word. Sita Ram joined the P.R.
College, Kakinada for his Intermediate Course. He was already married but stayed with his
mother in Kakinada
– his wife had not yet come of age. He
was a keen student, and was drawn to Ramakrishna Rao like the fly towards
jaggery. The teacher was lean, of medium
build, and wore thick glasses; he was a Brahmo (there was a rumour that only
Brahmos could get employed at that college, which was one of the seats of
progressive thinking during the late nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries). He led by example – and, no
wonder, Sita Ram became his disciple. In
due course, Sita Ram was allowed access to the teacher’s home for additional
sessions (not just about English, but about becoming a better human being as
well).
Time for Dussehra vacation.
Sita Ram returned from his village, rejuvenated. ‘How did you spend your time?’ asked
Ramakrishna Rao. ‘Very well Sir’,
replied Sita Ram.
‘Other than eating mouth-watering food, what did you do
there?’
‘We played cards with my cousins, Sir!’
‘Shame on you. You
give in to a vice?’
‘This is the only time-pass activity in our village,
Sir!’
‘Don’t you feel like continuing as you go on?’
‘Yes, Sir’.
‘That is why
it is called a vice. There are
innumerable ways to pass time. You
should cultivate hobby which you can pursue with great passion. For instance, you can tend to the
garden. Or you can read books, and
expand the horizons of knowledge’.
‘I think I’ll
take up reading, Sir’. And, ere long,
Sita Ram had read annotated editions of all the works of Shakespeare, Keats,
Shelly and others.
*
* * * * * * * *
The students were whispering something
amongst themselves. At the approach of
Sita Ram, they became quiet. Sita Ram
asked them, ‘What’s the matter? Why did
you all become silent all of a sudden?’
‘This is not
meant to be discussed before you’, said one of his classmates.
‘Oh, is it
about me? Fine. Then I’ll leave. You carry on’, Sita Ram was about to continue
on his walk.
‘No, Sita Ram,
it is not about you. It is only a bit of
gossip – we just learnt that a very famous litterateur of our village has taken
a new concubine, within three days of the demise of the current one. We know you are a protege of our English
teacher, so we thought you won’t relish it’.
‘Let me carry
on with my work’! Sita Ram resumed his
walk.
*
* * * * * * * *
Sita Ram had
just recovered from a double-bout of typhoid, so was trying to cover lost
ground even during lunch breaks. On one
such occasion, he overheard a fellow-student calling out to another, ‘Hey
Sundaram, I saw your sister at the temple yesterday. She looks like a female version of you’,
while others giggled. Sita Ram looked up
and asked the caller, ‘Are you not mistaken?
Sundaram has three brothers and no sisters’.
‘Oh, sorry,
Sita Ram, I did not notice you. I was
only pulling Sundaram’s leg about the child his father bore out of his
mistress’.
Sita Ram felt
distressed. On the one hand, the college
proactively taught progressivism, while there were regressive thinkers by his
side.
One evening,
Sita Ram expressed this regret at this dichotomy to his guru, Ramakrishna Rao,
who said, ‘Disloyalty to wife has existed from time immemorial. That is the reason why loyalty to wife, or
Ekapatnivritya, becomes such a desirable ideal.
Understand that whatever challenges you face while living up to your
ideal, you have to countenance by yourself, perhaps even without encouragement
or despite active discouragement’.
*
* * * * * * * * * *
One day, there
was a discussion about a person who is overly interfering in others’ lives,
chutzpah, for short. Ramakrishna Rao
pronounced it correctly as ‘hoospeh’, and spelt it as ‘chutzpeh’. One student, Adinarayana, stood up, ‘Sir, you
have misspelt chutzpah’. ‘Spell it
correctly, then’.
‘Please call
for the dictionary, Sir’.
‘Venkateswarlu,
go fetch the dictionary from my table’.
Venkateswarlu
returned with a copy of the calico-bound Oxford Dictionary. ‘Yes, I stand corrected. I misspelt chutzpah’. ‘That isn’t enough, Sir. You need to write an imposition for ten
times’.
Sita Ram was
shocked. What was Adinarayana up
to? Should he disrespect his teacher
like that?
‘All
right. I shall write’, and the teacher wrote
the imposition on the black board, and added, ‘I’m glad that you, Adinarayana,
ensured Rule of Law in my class’.
After the class,
Seshagiri congratulated Adinarayana.
‘Our English lecturer is always full of himself. You taught him a good lesson and he dare not
make us write imposition in future’.
Narasimhulu chipped in, ‘When I complained of our teacher’s dictatorship
to my elder brother, he only retorted that strict bachelors are shrews who
can’t be tamed, as they don’t know the difficulty of bearing the weight of
‘Samsara’ (family)’. Everyone laughed.
‘Listen, boys,
what do you know of your teacher to talk ill about him? He is loyal to a shadow’, the students heard
the commanding voice of the Principal, Sir Raghupati Venkatratnam Naidu, who
was an active Brahmo and a pioneer in the rehabilitation of the Devadasis.
The students
dispersed. Sita Ram, who heard the
Principal, wanted to know more.
*
* * * * * * * *
Ramakrishna
Rao was born in a pious and traditional family.
His father wanted him to take up Western education so that it can earn
him a livelihood in the then present scheme of things. The boy had his ‘Upanayana’ (initiation into
Brahmanism / sacred thread) at the age of eight. Before he could be touched by Western
liberalism he was married to Sita, when he was fourteen, and she, eight. There were no photographs at the wedding, and
the only memories of the five-day event were the anecdotes recollected by
relatives and friends long afterwards.
In deference to the customs of those days, he pursued his education at
his parental home, while she grew up in hers.
Ramakrishna Rao had joined the Intermediate course at the Noble College,
Masulipatnam and come under the influence of Sir Raghupati Venkataratnam
Naidu’s Brahmo spirit. When she was ten,
she was down with cholera. She was too
weak to resist the disease. She passed
away within ten days of contracting cholera.
Ramakrishna
Rao was studying Intermediate, and was greatly grieved by the loss. He could not clearly recollect her face, but
she was gone before he could even picturise her in his thoughts and
dreams. But, he felt he was
widowed. After six months of her death,
his in-laws offered her younger sister, Venkata Lakshmi, then eight, to
him. He made it clear that he was a
widower, and that they should offer her hand to a bachelor. ‘But, your marriage was not even
consummated’, said his father-in-law.
‘No, uncle. I promised myself to
Sita’.
‘You have an
artistic hand. Can you sketch her face,
at least? I bet you cannot!’
‘You are right
uncle, I cannot paint her picture. But I
cannot see any other girl in her place in my heart’.
His
mother-in-law just returned from the kitchen, and had a sorrowful look on her
face. ‘What do I hear about you,
Ramakrishna? Your mother tells me that
you insist on eating only bland food, and that you eat light food at
night. What’s all this?’ she asked.
‘Aunty, what
does a woman, who has lost her husband, do?
Does she not eat bland food, and take rice only once in a day? I’ve lost my wife, so I am doing the same’.
‘But, the
rules apply only to widows. Moreover,
you are a Brahmachari (bachelor)’.
‘Your
daughter, Sita, was married to me, so I’m not a bachelor. I believe in gender equality. If you feel what I do is wrong, then widows
should not be thrust with this enforced austerity. I have taken my decision. May Venakata Lakshmi be blessed with a happy
married life’.
His father-in-law
walked out in a huff, and his mother-in-law followed suit, wiping her tears
away with the edge of her saree.
Ramakrishna
Rao’s parents got the message that their son was firm in his views on this
issue, and never thereafter brought this issue up.
Even after his
parents’ demise, Ramakrishna Rao continued to live the austere life, while
initiating his pupils into the path of progress.
*
* * * * * * * *
‘That’s the
greatness of my guru’, my grandpa concluded.
He looked at me. I was
silent. He understood what I was going
through. He lifted my head, and wiped
the tears which were overflowing from my eyes.
*
* * * * * * * * *
2 comments:
Great to know about such progressive views of Rao. Even today widows are not treated on par with other women even in so called advanced metropolitan cities. Wondering whether such changes will ever happen?
Hari
At least those of us who are progressive should spread the good word....and we wont be popular anyway! i'm doing my bit!
Post a Comment